What is this? Already posing the question about Netanyahu with purposeful tone as if Netanyahu was wrong in his condemnation of UN human rights council…! What is this relentless Netanyahu bashing because apparently its fashionable and seems to be the prevailing custom with many in the Western media. If for nothing: Netanyahu seems to me to be the most clear headed statesmen especially knowing the genuine intentions and characteristics of the Mullah’s ruling Iran. At least if not for his courage or his firm resoluteness openly begin against the Mullah’s, he appears to be the only leader sympathetic to Iranians terrible plight living under the brutality of the Islamist regime of the Mullah’s. So, I suggest whatever your personal opinion is about Netanyahu try not to present the question in capacity of a host in ways that insinuates degradation of the subject matter—- in this case Netanyahu’s UN speech, particularly knowing that your guest in this instance is less-friendly to the noted individual and almost a borderline criticizer of the current prime minster of Israel. Along this thought I wondered why you forgot to ask your guest questions about whether Netanyahu was meaningful and relevant when he pointed in the same speech the fact that no army in the history has had dealing encountering an enemy that lived among the civilians and uses civilians to launch attacks, tunneling grounds rising up in any Israeli’s citizens living homes. No army before went to destroy an enemy that dismiss every rule of engagement and keeps no honor in war by blowing up innocent civilians targeting civilians instead of fighting with soldiers. And, no army except Israeli army warns before streaks. I imagine these were part of Netanyahu’s speech too. But you decided to be absent minded dismissing these parts in his speech by putting the question in a belittling tone which incidentally was the main reasons why UN human rights council was condemned for leaving these facts about engagement out which in the first place may have prompted Netanyahu to talk about it. So once again try to be aware and portray Netanyahu’s speech substance the way it really happen and was.
What is this? Already posing the question about Netanyahu with purposeful tone as if Netanyahu was wrong in his condemnation of UN human rights council…! What is this relentless Netanyahu bashing because apparently its fashionable and seems to be the prevailing custom with many in the Western media. If for nothing: Netanyahu seems to me to be the most clear headed statesmen especially knowing the genuine intentions and characteristics of the Mullah’s ruling Iran. At least if not for his courage or his firm resoluteness openly begin against the Mullah’s, he appears to be the only leader sympathetic to Iranians terrible plight living under the brutality of the Islamist regime of the Mullah’s. So, I suggest whatever your personal opinion is about Netanyahu try not to present the question in capacity of a host in ways that insinuates degradation of the subject matter—- in this case Netanyahu’s UN speech, particularly knowing that your guest in this instance is less-friendly to the noted individual and almost a borderline criticizer of the current prime minster of Israel. Along this thought I wondered why you forgot to ask your guest questions about whether Netanyahu was meaningful and relevant when he pointed in the same speech the fact that no army in the history has had dealing encountering an enemy that lived among the civilians and uses civilians to launch attacks, tunneling grounds rising up in any Israeli’s citizens living homes. No army before went to destroy an enemy that dismiss every rule of engagement and keeps no honor in war by blowing up innocent civilians targeting civilians instead of fighting with soldiers. And, no army except Israeli army warns before streaks. I imagine these were part of Netanyahu’s speech too. But you decided to be absent minded dismissing these parts in his speech by putting the question in a belittling tone which incidentally was the main reasons why UN human rights council was condemned for leaving these facts about engagement out which in the first place may have prompted Netanyahu to talk about it. So once again try to be aware and portray Netanyahu’s speech substance the way it really happen and was.
نظرات بسته است